Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39932968›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A Study on the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Parent Tic Questionnaire.

Qiang Ding, Douglas W Woods, Kathryn E Barber, Wen Xu, Ying Zhao, Shuqin Shen, Jinhua Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qiang DingDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Douglas W WoodsDepartment of Psychology, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America.
Kathryn E BarberDepartment of Psychology, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6359-8845
Wen XuDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Ying ZhaoDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Shuqin ShenDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Jinhua SunDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8566-1518

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Parent Tic Questionnaire (PTQ) is a tool for parents to assess their child's tic severity, but its effectiveness in non-Western contexts like China has not been thoroughly examined. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the PTQ in assessing motor and vocal tic severity among Chinese children diagnosed with tic disorders.

methodParents of 268 Chinese children and adolescents aged 6-17 years, diagnosed with tic disorders, completed the PTQ. The study assessed tic severity using the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) and PTQ. Additionally, obsessive-compulsive symptoms were measured using the Children Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS), and other behavioral problems were evaluated using the Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-48).

resultsThe PTQ showed acceptable to good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.67 for motor, 0.77 for vocal, and 0.79 for total tic scores) and acceptable to good two-week test-retest reliability (intraclass correlations, ICC = 0.74 for motor, 0.81 for vocal, and 0.79 for total tic scores). It demonstrated good convergent validity with the YGTSS and effective discriminant validity from obsessive-compulsive and internalizing symptoms (i.e., anxiety and psychosomatic). Furthermore, our analysis revealed significant variability in item difficulty across the questionnaire, indicating differences in how various tics are perceived and reported by Chinese parents, which may influence the assessment's accuracy and reliability. DISCUSSION: The findings indicate that the Chinese version of the PTQ is a reliable and valid tool for assessing tic severity in Chinese children with tic disorders, offering significant implications for clinical assessment in diverse cultural contexts. Additionally, our findings on item difficulty highlight the need for further cultural adaptations of the PTQ.

Indexed as

ParentsPsychometricsTic DisordersAdolescentChildChinaFemaleHumansMaleObsessive-Compulsive DisorderReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39932968
PMCPMC11813085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.