Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39932918›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Comparing statistical learning methods for complex trait prediction from gene expression.

Noah Klimkowski Arango, Fabio Morgante

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Noah Klimkowski ArangoCenter for Human Genetics, Clemson University, Greenwood, SC, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1000-559X
Fabio MorganteCenter for Human Genetics, Clemson University, Greenwood, SC, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3285-1988

Funding

Statistical Methods for Gene Regulatory Analysis From Single Cell Genomics DataP20GM139769 · NIGMS · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI ANHOLT, ROBERT R. H, ARNO, GAVIN · 2021 to 2025
$10.8M
Understanding and using gene-by-context interactions in human complex trait geneticsR35GM146868 · NIGMS · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI Fabio Morgante · 2022 to 2026
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM139769NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM146868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of complex traits is an important task in quantitative genetics. Genotypes have been used for trait prediction using a variety of methods such as mixed models, Bayesian methods, penalized regression methods, dimension reduction methods, and machine learning methods. Recent studies have shown that gene expression levels can produce higher prediction accuracy than genotypes. However, only a few prediction methods were tested in these studies. Thus, a comprehensive assessment of methods is needed to fully evaluate the potential of gene expression as a predictor of complex trait phenotypes. Here, we used data from the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) to compare the ability of several existing statistical learning methods to predict starvation resistance and startle response from gene expression in the two sexes separately. The methods considered differ in assumptions about the distribution of gene effects-ranging from models that assume that every gene affects the trait to more sparse models-and their ability to capture gene-gene interactions. We also used functional annotation (i.e., Gene Ontology (GO)) as a source of biological information to inform prediction models. The results show that differences in prediction accuracy exist. For example, methods performing variable selection achieved higher prediction accuracy for starvation resistance in females, while they generally had lower accuracy for startle response in both sexes. Incorporating GO annotations further improved prediction accuracy for a few GO terms of biological significance. Biological significance extended to the genes underlying highly predictive GO terms. Notably, the Insulin-like Receptor (InR) was prevalent across methods and sexes for starvation resistance. For startle response, crumbs (crb) and imaginal disc growth factor 2 (Idgf2) were found for females and males, respectively. Our results confirmed the potential of transcriptomic prediction and highlighted the importance of selecting appropriate methods and strategies in order to achieve accurate predictions.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAnimalsDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGenotypeMaleModels, GeneticPhenotypeReflex, Startle

Identifiers

PMID39932918
PMCPMC11813155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.