ArticlePloS one2025
Mendelian randomization analysis to identify potential drug targets for osteoarthritis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in heterogeneity and classification of osteoarthritis.Bone research · 2026Review
- A Large-Scale Multi-omics Polygenic Risk Score Analysis Identified Candidate Biomarkers Associated with Heel Bone Mineral Density.Calcified tissue international · 2026Article
- Evaluating the causal effects of circulating plasma proteins on the risk of malignant neoplasms of bone and articular cartilage.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Heat shock proteins in osteoarthritis: molecular mechanisms, pathogenic roles, and therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOsteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent chronic joint disease for which there is a lack of effective treatments. In this study, we used Mendelian randomization analysis to identify circulating proteins that are causally associated with OA-related traits, providing important insights into potential drug targets for OA.
methodCausal associations between 1553 circulating proteins and five OA-related traits were assessed in large-scale two-sample MR analyses using Wald ratio or inverse variance weighting, and the results were corrected for Bonferroni. In addition, sensitivity analyses were performed to validate the reliability of the MR results, including reverse MR analysis and Steiger filtering to ensure the causal direction between circulating proteins and OA; Bayesian co-localization and phenotypic scanning were used to eliminate confounding effects and horizontal pleiotropy. External validation was performed to exclude incidental findings using novel plasma protein quantitative trait loci. Finally, the online analysis tool Enrichr was utilized to screen drugs and molecular docking was performed to predict binding modes and energies between proteins and drugs to identify the most stable and likely binding modes and drugs.
resultFour proteins were ultimately found to be reliably and causally associated with three OA-related features: DNAJB12 and USP8 were associated with knee OA, IL12B with spinal OA, and RGMB with thumb OA. The ORs for the above proteins were 1.51 (95% CI, 1.26-1.81), 1.72 (95% CI, 1.42-2.08), 0.87 (95% CI, 0.81-0.92), and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.47-0.75), respectively. Drug-predicting small molecules (doxazosin, XEN 103, and montelukast) that simultaneously target three proteins, DNAJB12, USP8, and IL12B, docked well.
conclusionBased on our comprehensive analysis, we can draw the conclusion that there is a causal relationship between the genetic levels of DNAJB12, USP8, IL12B, and RGMB and the risk of respective OA.They may be potential options for OA screening and prevention in clinical practice. They can also serve as candidate molecules for future mechanism exploration and drug target selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.