Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39932907›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Ecological momentary assessment of physical and eating behaviours: The WEALTH feasibility and optimisation study with recommendations for large-scale data collection.

Michael Janek, Jitka Kuhnova, Greet Cardon, Delfien Van Dyck, Richard Cimler, Steriani Elavsky, Leopold K Fezeu, Jean-Michel Oppert, Christoph Buck, Antje Hebestreit and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Michael JanekFaculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Jitka KuhnovaFaculty of Science, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czechia.
Greet CardonDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Delfien Van DyckDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1783-9075
Richard CimlerFaculty of Science, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czechia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6712-9894
Steriani ElavskyDepartment of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia.
Leopold K FezeuNutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord (USPN), INSERM, INRAE, CNAM, Center of Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Bobigny, France.
Jean-Michel OppertNutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord (USPN), INSERM, INRAE, CNAM, Center of Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Bobigny, France.
Christoph BuckLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0261-704X
Antje HebestreitLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Janas HarringtonSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Luis SigchaHealth Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9968-5024
Pepijn Van de VenHealth Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Alan DonnellyHealth Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Tomas VetrovskyFaculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2529-7069
WEALTH consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) enables the real-time capture of health-related behaviours, their situational contexts, and associated subjective experiences. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of an EMA targeting physical and eating behaviours, optimise its protocol, and provide recommendations for future large-scale EMA data collections. The study involved 52 participants (age 31±9 years, 56% females) from Czechia, France, Germany, and Ireland completing a 9-day free-living EMA protocol using the HealthReact platform connected to a Fitbit tracker. The EMA protocol included time-based (7/day), event-based (up to 10/day), and self-initiated surveys, each containing 8 to 17 items assessing physical and eating behaviours and related contextual factors such as affective states, location, and company. Qualitative insights were gathered from post-EMA feedback interviews. Compliance was low (median 49%), particularly for event-based surveys (median 34%), and declined over time. Many participants were unable or unwilling to complete surveys in certain contexts (e.g., when with family), faced interference with their daily schedules, and encountered occasional technical issues, suggesting the need for thorough initial training, an individualised protocol, and systematic compliance monitoring. The number of event-based surveys was less than desired for the study, with a median of 2.4/day for sedentary events, when 4 were targeted, and 0.9/day for walking events, when 3 were targeted. Conducting simulations using participants' Fitbit data allowed for optimising the triggering rules, achieving the desired median number of sedentary and walking surveys (3.9/day for both) in similar populations. Self-initiated reports of meals and drinks yielded more reports than those prompted in time-based and event-based EMA surveys, suggesting that self-initiated surveys might better reflect actual eating behaviours. This study highlights the importance of assessing feasibility and optimising EMA protocols to enhance subsequent compliance and data quality. Conducting pre-tests to refine protocols and procedures, including simulations using participants' activity data for optimal event-based triggering rules, is crucial for successful large-scale data collection in EMA studies of physical and eating behaviours.

Indexed as

Data CollectionEcological Momentary AssessmentExerciseFeeding BehaviorAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39932907
PMCPMC11813119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.