ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2025
Ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions disrupt learning to reward others.
Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The neural basis of prosocial effort-based decision making in older adults at risk for Alzheimer's disease.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Dorsomedial and ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions differentially impact social influence and temporal discounting.PLoS biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reinforcement learning is a fundamental process through which humans and other animals attain rewards for themselves. However, to act prosocially, we must also learn how our choices reward others. The ventromedial prefrontal cortex has been independently linked to reinforcement learning and prosocial behaviour, yet its causal impact on prosocial reinforcement learning and the roles of its multiple subregions remain unknown. Here, a large group of adults with rare focal ventromedial prefrontal cortex damage (n = 28) and two carefully age- and gender-matched control groups (lesions elsewhere, n = 21; healthy controls, n = 124) completed a reinforcement learning task where they learnt to win rewards for another person (prosocial), for themselves (self) or in a control condition where participants saw points, but they were not translated into rewards for either individual (no one, control condition) on separate trials. A novel computational model incorporating separate learning rates for positive and negative prediction errors best explained behaviour in all groups. Importantly, compared to both control groups, patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex damage were less accurate and had lower learning rates from positive prediction errors when rewarding another person relative to when no one benefitted, and higher learning rates for negative prediction errors when learning for others relative to self. Unlike controls, ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesion patients also showed a reduced self-benefitting advantage. They were equally accurate and learnt at a similar rate from positive prediction errors for self and neither individual. Strikingly, voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping revealed that damage to subgenual anterior cingulate cortex and anterior cingulate cortex gyrus specifically disrupted prosocial reinforcement learning. These findings highlight the importance of ventromedial prefrontal cortex integrity for multiple aspects of reinforcement learning, with damage to subgenual anterior cingulate cortex and anterior cingulate cortex gyrus critical in learning to reward others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.