ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Efficient storage and regression computation for population-scale genome sequencing studies.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Highly efficient genotype compression leveraging genealogical relatedness.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Analysis-ready VCF at Biobank scale using Zarr.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Enabling efficient analysis of biobank-scale data with genotype representation graphs.Nature computational science · 2025Article
- Unified meta regression models for rare variant association studies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Analysis-ready VCF at Biobank scale using Zarr.GigaScience · 2025Article
- IGD: a simple, efficient genotype data format.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Hypometric genetics: Improved power in genetic discovery by incorporating quality control flags.American journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- Genotype Representation Graphs: Enabling Efficient Analysis of Biobank-Scale Data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe growing availability of large-scale population biobanks has the potential to significantly advance our understanding of human health and disease. However, the massive computational and storage demands of whole genome sequencing (WGS) data pose serious challenges, particularly for underfunded institutions or researchers in developing countries. This disparity in resources can limit equitable access to cutting-edge genetic research.
resultsWe present novel algorithms and regression methods that dramatically reduce both computation time and storage requirements for WGS studies, with particular attention to rare variant representation. By integrating these approaches into PLINK 2.0, we demonstrate substantial gains in efficiency without compromising analytical accuracy. In an exome-wide association analysis of 19.4 million variants for the body mass index phenotype in 125 077 individuals (AllofUs project data), we reduced runtime from 695.35 min (11.5 h) on a single machine to 1.57 min with 30 GB of memory and 50 threads (or 8.67 min with 4 threads). Additionally, the framework supports multi-phenotype analyses, further enhancing its flexibility. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our optimized methods are fully integrated into PLINK 2.0 and can be accessed at: https://www.cog-genomics.org/plink/2.0/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.