ArticleCritical care explorations2025
Invasive Arterial Pressure Monitoring: Are We Confident Making Decisions Based on Reliable Values?
Article in Critical care explorations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors influencing invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring accuracy: a qualitative study using the i-PARIHS framework and personas.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- INPRESS: INvasive PRESSure Monitoring Knowledge and Practice Survey.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A prerequisite for accurate invasive arterial pressure measurement is familiarity with measurement principles and pitfalls. Using an electronic survey, we assessed knowledge about invasive arterial pressure monitoring and current invasive arterial pressure monitoring practices in the ICU. The questionnaire was sent to nurses and physicians who are members of the French Intensive Care Society and the Réseau Européen de Recherche en Ventilation Artificielle network. Three hundred nine nurses and 76 physicians responded. We identified considerable gaps in knowledge and differences in practices that can significantly impact the reliability of invasive arterial pressure measurement, mainly the confusion between zeroing and leveling the transducer and the heterogeneity in external landmarks choice for the phlebostatic axis. In modern critical care, where mean arterial pressure targets are recommended and where patients are awake and/or frequently mobilized, standardized invasive arterial pressure monitoring is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.