ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Association among cognitive emotion regulation strategies, psychological flexibility and subjective well-being in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional latent profile and mediation analysis.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Judicious use of latent profile analysis in supportive care: the distinction between mono- and multi-construct applications.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Analysis of latent profiles of stressors and their influencing factors in patients with breast cancer undergoing postoperative chemotherapy: a mixed-methods study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Be Kind to Yourself: Testing Self-Compassion, Fear of Recurrence, and Generalized Anxiety in Women with Cancer Within a Multiple-Mediation Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo explore the relationship among cognitive emotion regulation strategies, psychological flexibility, and subjective well-being, analyze the latent profiles of cognitive emotion regulation strategies, and examine the mediating role of psychological flexibility between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and subjective well-being in patients with breast cancer.
methodsThe cross-sectional study was conducted from April to December 2023, involving 313 patients with breast cancer. The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-short, the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II, and the Index of Well-Being were utilized for data collection. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation coefficient, latent profile, Bayesian factor, and mediation effect were used for data analysis.
resultsThere was a small to strong correlation among the variables. Latent profile analysis revealed three potential profiles of cognitive emotion regulation strategies, named "low copers", "high copers", and "flexible copers", respectively. Compared with the "flexible copers" group, psychological flexibility might potentially mediate the relationship between the "low copers" profile and subjective well-being, as well as between the "high copers" profile and subjective well-being, with relative indirect effects of -0.720 (95%CI: -1.104, -0.387) and -1.216 (95%CI: -1.732, -0.711), respectively.
conclusionThe results examined the relationship among variables, identified three distinct profiles of cognitive emotion regulation strategies, and indicated that psychological flexibility might serve as a potential mediator between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and subjective well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39932638What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.