Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39932584›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2025

Outcome measurement in functional neurological disorder: A qualitative study on the views of patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals.

Sonja Rutten, Abigail Bradley-Westguard, Timothy R Nicholson, Susannah Pick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sonja RuttenDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3771-179X
Abigail Bradley-WestguardInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Timothy R NicholsonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2350-2332
Susannah PickInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. susannah.pick@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2001-6723

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research MR/V032771/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this qualitative study, we aimed to obtain and synthesise the views of patients with functional neurological disorder (FND), their caregivers, and relevant healthcare professionals (HCPs) on outcome measurement in FND.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 FND patients, 18 caregivers and 21 HCPs, sampled purposively in the United Kingdom. Transcripts were analysed through inductive thematic analysis.

resultsWhilst reduction or resolution of FND symptoms were frequently mentioned as important treatment goals in all groups, this was reported by a larger proportion of caregivers and HCPs than patients. Patients most frequently hoped for improvements in mental health/well-being. Other important treatment goals were resuming work, and an increase in independence, self-management or self-efficacy. Of the 20 domains deemed relevant for outcome assessment, improvements in FND symptoms, emotional well-being, activities of daily living and quality-of-life, were mentioned most frequently. None of the participants thought that outcome assessment should be purely clinician-rated or objective; all believed that the patient's subjective experience should be central. Nevertheless, participants in all groups acknowledged that clinician-rated or objective OMIs have added value in clinical outcome assessment. The benefits of digital outcome assessment were also mentioned by several participants.

conclusionsThis is the first study to capture the views of key stakeholders on outcome assessment in FND. The findings indicate that outcome measures for FND should be patient-centred, whilst also including HCP opinion. Critical domains for assessment are FND symptoms, mental health, quality-of-life and the ability to perform activities of daily living.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCaregiversHealth PersonnelNervous System DiseasesOutcome Assessment, Health CareActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeConversion disorderOutcome assessmentQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID39932584
PMCPMC11814038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.