SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025
The use of external fixation for the correction of recurrent clubfoot: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Management of idiopathic clubfoot: an umbrella review and CPAM-LRC consensus: Limb Reconstruction Committee of Orthopedics Branch of China International Exchange and Promotion Association for Medical and Health Care (CPAM-LRC).Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- [Ilizarov external fixation technique combined with limited osteotomy for post-traumatic equinovarus deformity].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecurrent clubfoot (CF) remains a challenging orthopedic condition, often requiring surgical intervention due to deformity rigidity and scarring from previous treatments. External fixation, particularly the Ilizarov technique, has emerged as a promising approach to correct recurrent and complex CF deformities. However, there is considerable variability in reported results regarding success and recurrence rates.
objectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of external fixation with a focus on success rates, recurrence rates, and complication profiles in patients treated for recurrent CF.
methodsA systematic search of five databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library) was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies evaluating external fixation for recurrent clubfoot and reporting quantitative data on success and recurrence rates were included. A total of 438 records were screened and 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. Data extraction was performed on demographic characteristics, treatment details, and outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model to pool success and recurrence rates.
resultsThe review analyzed 21 studies involving 489 treated feet in 406 patients. The pooled overall success rate was 81.4% (95% CI: 74.5-88.4%), while the pooled recurrence rate was 17.7% (95% CI: 11.3-24.1%). The studies showed minimal heterogeneity (I² = 0%) in both success and recurrence rates. Complications were common, with pin tract infection being the most common (29.3%), followed by toe contractures and digital ischemia.
conclusionsExternal fixation is an effective approach for recurrent CF, with satisfactory success rates. However, the risk of complications underscores the need for vigilant postoperative care. The results support the use of external fixation for complex CF recurrences, but further studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.