ArticleJournal of neurology2025
A real-world study on the utility of regular rituximab treatment for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rituximab (RTX) is a monoclonal antibody targeting the B-cell CD20 surface antigen used as a prophylactic treatment for Aquaporin 4-immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG)-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). However, a consensus regarding dosage and maintenance intervals is lacking, and the effects of regular/irregular use on disease recurrence and prognosis, and the risk factors associated with clinical relapse, remain unclear. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy/safety of regular RTX use in patients with NMOSD, and explored risk factors associated with clinical relapses. Data from 106 patients with NMOSD were retrospectively collected from January 5, 2016, and March 1, 2023. Patients were categorized as regular/irregular RTX use, with the latter defined by two intervals of > 9 months, or a single interval of > 12 months, without B-cell monitoring. Compared to the regular treatment group, irregular treatment group showed significant higher annual recurrence rate (ARR) (p = 0.033), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score (p = 0.041), and proportions of severe relapse (p = 0.006). In regular RTX use group, the cumulative relapse risk after RTX treatment was significantly lower (p < 0.001). When only considering relapses occurring more than 1 month after starting RTX treatment, 82.3% (51/62) of AQP4-IgG + NMOSD were relapse-free. Independent risk factors of relapse included serum AQP4-IgG titer ≥ 320 at initial disease onset, and severe demyelinating episodes in the first attack. There were no severe side effects. Regular RTX treatment significantly reduces the ARR, incidence of severe relapse, and disability risk in patients with NMOSD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39932569What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.