Observational studyJournal of neurology2025
Differences in functional outcome of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients with critical illness polyneuropathy/ myopathy: a multicenter cohort study.
Observational study in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUp to 80% of intensive care unit (ICU) patients suffer from neuromuscular disorders like critical illness polyneuropathy/myopathy (CIP/CIM), requiring further rehabilitation.
objectiveThis study investigates differences in the clinical course between Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and non-COVID-19 patients with CIP/CIM undergoing post-acute neurological rehabilitation (PANR) and the impact of COVID-19 on rehabilitation outcomes.
methodsA multicenter observational study was conducted in nine German PANR facilities. The clinical course and outcome were compared between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients at rehabilitation admission and discharge. Functional outcomes were measured with the modified Ranking Scale (mRS) and the Barthel Index (BI). Functional independence was defined as either mRS Score < 3 or BI > 75 at discharge, discharged home without nursing support with a BI > 65, or discharged to further rehabilitation (phase D). To analyze outcome predictors, Cox regression was used.
resultsA total of 323 patients (COVID-19 n = 166) after an ICU stay were enrolled, and outcome measures were available for 298. 56 of them achieved functional independence at discharge. COVID-19 patients had better functional scores at admission and discharge and a shorter length of stay as the non-COVID group. Pre-existing diabetes was significantly negatively associated with functioning at discharge.
conclusionsThis analysis provides the first evidence for differences and predictors of the clinical course and outcome for COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients with CIP/CIM in the phase of post-acute rehabilitation. Our results offer valuable impulses for rehabilitation strategies for these patients. https://drks.de/search/de , German Clinical Trials Register, ID DRKS00022845, registered on September 1, 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39932563What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.