ArticleSkeletal radiology2025
Cauda equina movements during the Valsalva maneuver in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: introducing a novel method for redundant nerve evaluations.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate whether inchworm-like cauda equina movements can be observed in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis using a novel Valsalva maneuver cine MRI (cMRI) protocol. MATERIALS AND
methodsFifteen lumbar spinal stenosis patients (11 males; mean age, 73.9 years) underwent lumbar static MRI (sMRI) and sagittal 60-s cMRI. The cMRI protocol, called the Kinematic Assessment of Redundant Nerves (KAoRN), included three resting and Valsalva maneuver sets. Two radiologists independently evaluated cauda equina movement and lumbar spinal stenosis severity from L1/2 to L5/S1 using an MRI lumbar spinal stenosis score. Scores from both analysts were averaged; the most severe averaged score from all levels was extracted and defined as the worst score. Moreover, the level at which severe stenosis (averaged score ≥ 3.5) was observed was counted.
resultsKAoRN-positive cauda equina movement was observed in 11 participants (73.3%). KAoRN-negative participants tended to have non-significantly higher worst lumbar spinal stenosis scores (4.0, interquartile range 3.9-4.0) than those of KAoRN-positive participants (3.5, interquartile range 3.0-4.0) (p = 0.310, χ
conclusionKAoRN-positive cauda equina movement is frequently observed in participants with lumbar spinal stenosis; however, it is not observed in all such cases. Further exploration of the differences in the presence or absence of KAoRN-positive findings may provide new insights into the diagnosis of clinically relevant LSS requiring surgical intervention. TRAIL REGISTRATION: The UMIN clinical trial number: UMIN000052276.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39932552What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.