ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
Eliminating the second CT scan of dual-tracer total-body PET/CT via deep learning-based image synthesis and registration.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging frontiers and challenges of artificial intelligence in PSMA-PET imaging: pioneering a new chapter in prostate cancer care.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Bone metastases from endocrine cancer: advances in diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Comparative Study on Effective Dose and Cancer Risk in Dual-tracer Hybrid Imaging - International Commission on Radiological Protection and Personalized Models.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to develop and validate a deep learning framework designed to eliminate the second CT scan of dual-tracer total-body PET/CT imaging.
methodsWe retrospectively included three cohorts of 247 patients who underwent dual-tracer total-body PET/CT imaging on two separate days (time interval:1-11 days). Out of these, 167 underwent [
resultsThe MAE for whole-body pseudo-ACCT images ranged from 97.64 to 112.59 HU across four tracers. The deep learning-based ASC PET images demonstrated high similarity to the ground-truth PET images. The MAE of SUV for whole-body PET images was 0.06 for [
conclusionThe proposed deep learning framework, combining RegGAN and non-rigid registration, shows promise in reducing CT radiation dose for dual-tracer total-body PET/CT imaging, with successful validation across multiple tracers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39932542What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.