ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Clinical characteristics and outcomes in leptomeningeal disease with or without brain metastasis: insights from an explorative data analysis of the Charité LMD registry.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes and prognostic factors in melanoma patients with leptomeningeal disease: a retrospective cohort study.Melanoma research · 2026Article
- Amelanotic primary thalamic melanoma: a case report.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Savolitinib in brain and leptomeningeal metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
objectivesLeptomeningeal disease (LMD) involves disseminating cancer cells to the leptomeninges and cerebrospinal fluid. The impact of intracranial parenchymal brain metastases and extracranial disease burden at LMD diagnosis remains unclear. This study evaluates these factors alongside local and systemic therapies before and after LMD diagnosis.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 188 patients diagnosed with LMD between 2011 and 2024. Data on demographics, imaging findings, and treatments were collected. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for survival analysis, and independent prognostic factors were identified using a backward-stepwise Cox regression model.
resultsPrimary cancers included breast cancer (34.0%), non-small cell lung cancer (22.3%), and melanoma (14.4%). LMD was diagnosed via MRI in 56.4% of cases, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology in 2.7%, and both in 41.0%. Median overall survival was 2.8 months [95% CI: 2.4 - 3.7]. Independent prognostic factors for improved survival included male sex (HR: 0.61 [95% CI: 0.40 - 0.93], p = 0.020), absence of hydrocephalus at LMD diagnosis (HR: 0.42 [95% CI: 0.22 - 0.79], p = 0.007), and targeted therapy post-diagnosis (HR: 0.33 [95% CI: 0.20 - 0.55], p < 0.001). Two or more lines of systemic therapy before LMD diagnosis increased mortality risk (HR: 1.73 [95% CI: 1.16 - 2.59], p = 0.007). Lack of CNS parenchymal disease at LMD diagnosis also increased risk (HR: 0.51 [95% CI: 0.30 - 0.89], p = 0.017). Pre-diagnosis radiation therapy showed no survival benefit, while post-diagnosis radiation improved outcomes (HR: 0.47 [95% CI: 0.32 - 0.70], p < 0.001).
conclusionAbsence of hydrocephalus and use of targeted therapy post-diagnosis are favorable prognostic factors, while extensive prior systemic therapy and CNS parenchymal disease worsen outcomes. Tailored therapies addressing intracranial disease are crucial for improving survival in LMD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.