ArticleJournal of behavioral addictions2025
Does nose spray addiction exist? A qualitative analysis of addiction components in rhinitis medicamentosa.
Article in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development, Factor Structure, and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of the Rhinitis Medicamentosa Questionnaire (RMQ) Among Topical Nasal Decongestant Users.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Perspectives on allergic rhinitis and related upper airway conditions: a qualitative meta-synthesis of patient and healthcare professional experiences.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Part II - imidazolines and rhinitis medicamentosa: how can we tackle the rebound dilemma?Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Nasal congestion is a prevalent symptom often alleviated with over-the-counter nasal sprays containing decongestants. Rhinitis medicamentosa (RM), caused by the overuse of decongestants leading to recurrent mucosal swelling, poses a significant challenge for specialists in managing patients. Despite advancements in understanding, research primarily consists of case series with limited data on its impact on quality of life. This qualitative study aimed to explore the effect of nasal spray overuse on quality of life and identify addiction components among individuals with RM. Methods: Twenty participants with RM were interviewed by an otorhinolaryngologist and addiction counsellor. The study employed a qualitative approach utilising directed content analysis and revealed eleven categories, classified into addiction components and distinctive features of nasal spray addiction. Results: The analysis revealed the presence of all Griffiths' addiction components in the identified themes. Additionally, sleep disorders, the feeling of suffocation, side effects, illness identity and psychological effects on nasal congestion significantly impair individuals' quality of life. Conclusion: This qualitative study identified key components of addiction in nasal spray overuse and suggested that RM might be conceptualised in the DSM-5 category of "Other (or Unknown) Substance-Related Disorders", considering the lack of psychoactive effects. Nevertheless, in view of the current findings, it also seems to be plausible to examine the phenomenon in the behavioural addiction framework. The study underscores the need for further research and intervention strategies to address the significant impact of RM on individuals' quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.