Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39932468›Full record

Trial reportTranslational vision science & technology2025

A Single-Center Sham and Active-Controlled Double-Blind Randomized Crossover Trial of the Magnetic Levator Prosthesis for Severe Blepharoptosis.

Kevin E Houston, Shrinivas Pundlik, Prerana Shivshanker, Alex R Bowers, Sarah LaRosa, Mara Robinson, James Chodosh, Lynn Brandes, Patrick Lee, Eleftherios I Paschalis

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04678115 (A Randomized Cross-Over Clinical Trial Comparing Two Non-Surgical Treatments for Severe Blepharoptosis), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04678115 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Cross-Over Clinical Trial Comparing Two Non-Surgical Treatments for Severe Blepharoptosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts Eye and Ear InfirmaryRan2021 to 2024Enrolled16ConditionsBlepharoptosis, Ptosis, Eyelid, Myasthenia Gravis, StrokeArmsMagnetic Levator Prosthesis (MLP), Kinesiotape Frontalis Sling (KTFS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kevin E HoustonDepartment of Veteran Affairs, Central Western Massachusetts, Optometry Service, Worcester, MA, USA.
Shrinivas PundlikHarvard Medical School Department of Ophthalmology, Schepens Eye Research Institute of Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.
Prerana ShivshankerHarvard Medical School Department of Ophthalmology, Schepens Eye Research Institute of Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.
Alex R BowersHarvard Medical School Department of Ophthalmology, Schepens Eye Research Institute of Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.
Sarah LaRosaBrooks Rehabilitation Center for Low Vision, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Mara RobinsonMassachusetts Eye and Ear, Facial Nerve Clinic, Harvard Medical School Department of Otolaryngology, Boston, MA, USA.
James ChodoshDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Lynn BrandesHarvard Medical School Department of Ophthalmology, Schepens Eye Research Institute of Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.
Patrick LeeMassachusetts Eye and Ear, Vision Rehabilitation Clinic, Harvard Medical School Department of Ophthalmology, Boston, MA, USA.
Eleftherios I PaschalisHarvard Medical School Department of Ophthalmology, Schepens Eye Research Institute of Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Management of Blepharoptosis with Neodymium Magnet Systems: The Boston Blink-netic ProjectR01EY029437 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI HOUSTON, KEVIN EDWARD · 2018 to 2022
$2.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029437
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the magnetic levator prosthesis (MLP) relative to active control with KT Tape, an elastic therapeutic tape used clinically to mechanically open the lids, and to a sham MLP worn in-office only. Methods: This was a double-masked, randomized crossover single-center trial of patients with severe unilateral or bilateral paralytic blepharoptosis defined as occlusion of the visual axis without frontalis recruitment. Patients were allocated to MLP or tape first and then crossed over after 2 weeks of use and a 2-week washout. Primary outcome was maximum eyelid closure on spontaneous blink measured in video frames with ImageJ. Primary patient-reported outcome was the Glasgow Benefit Inventory and, secondarily, comparison of the amount of eye opening and proportions of complete volitional blinks. Results: Of 16 patients randomized, 15 completed the crossover. MLP and tape equally improved eye opening over sham (MLP, 6.8 mm [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.2-8.4]; tape, 7.0 mm [5.4-8.6]; sham, 3.9 mm [2.3-5.5], all P < 0.001). Spontaneous blinks were significantly better with MLP (2.4 mm [95% CI, 1.5-3.7] compared to tape, 4.1 mm [2.6-6.5], P < 0.001). Incomplete volitional blinks were much more common when wearing tape compared to when wearing the MLP (P < 0.001), which was not different from sham. There was a significant perceived benefit of both MLP and tape (P < 0.001). There were three related nonserious adverse events over 3539 hours of tape use and two related nonserious adverse events over 4632 hours of MLP use. Conclusions: The MLP was superior to KT tape and sham for the treatment of severe blepharoptosis. Translational Relevance: First randomized controlled clinical trial of the MLP. (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04678115?cond=Blepharoptosis&term=kinesiotape&rank=1, NCT04678115).

Indexed as

BlepharoptosisEyelidsOculomotor MusclesProstheses and ImplantsAdultAgedBlinkingCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39932468
PMCPMC11817847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.