ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
Phenotypic Distinctions Between EYS- and USH2A-Associated Retinitis Pigmentosa in an Asian Population.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and Molecular Characteristics of Foveal Sparing Phenotype in Chinese Patients With Inherited Retinal Diseases.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Sex Distributions in the Most Frequent Autosomal Genetic Causes of Retinitis Pigmentosa.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Four novel genetic mutations are associated with patent foramen ovale in Tibetan population using whole exome sequencing.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study compares clinical characteristics of retinitis pigmentosa (RP) associated with mutations in the EYS and USH2A genes in a Southeast Asian cohort. Methods: Prospective single-center study of families with EYS- or USH2A-associated RP seen at the Singapore National Eye Centre. Comprehensive ophthalmic evaluations, multimodal imaging, genetic testing, and longitudinal follow-up identified clinically useful differentiating features between the two genotypes. Results: A total of 300 families with RP were enrolled, with EYS- and USH2A-associated RP, accounting for 24.7% of all probands and 50.7% of solved or likely solved cases. USH2A cases were predominantly nonsyndromic RP (75%). EYS-associated RP was more severe in functional and structural outcomes, and patients were more myopic than USH2A (SE -3.31 vs. -0.69; P < 0.0001). EYS RP displayed peripapillary nasal sparing on autofluorescence imaging more frequently than USH2A (57.6% vs. 26.7%; P = 0.006), whereas USH2A cases more often had a parafoveal ring (73.3% vs. 30.3%; P = 0.0002). Multiple logistic regression identified diagnostic features with 83.2% accuracy in distinguishing between EYS and USH2A, validated in a second unrelated clinical cohort. Conclusions: EYS- and USH2A-associated RP have overlapping clinical presentations but can often be distinguished based on a constellation of phenotypic features including disease onset and severity, refractive error, and fundus autofluorescence. These diagnostic features may support a more effective diagnostic strategy for these common forms of RP. Translational Relevance: Distinct clinical features differentiating EYS- and USH2A-associated RP provide valuable diagnostic tools that may inform personalized management and facilitate targeted interventions in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.