ArticleEpilepsia2025
SCN1A pathogenic variants do not have a distinctive blood-derived DNA methylation signature.
Article in Epilepsia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gestational deltamethrin exposure exacerbates post-traumatic epileptiform activity and social deficits, diminishing the therapeutic efficacy of curcumin in rats.Metabolic brain disease · 2026Article
- Lennox-Gastaut syndrome unveiled: Advancing diagnosis, therapies, and advocacy-insights from the Genoa International Workshop.Epilepsia · 2026Review
- SCN1A pathogenic variants do not have a distinctive blood-derived DNA methylation signature.Epilepsia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA methylation signatures ("episignatures") can be used as biomarkers of genetic aberrations, clinical phenotypes, and environmental exposures in rare diseases. Episignatures are utilized in molecular diagnostics and can clarify variants of uncertain significance. A growing number of disease genes, including epilepsy genes, exhibit robust and reproducible episignatures. However, whether SCN1A, the most prominent epilepsy gene, has one or more episignatures has not yet been determined. We generated genome-wide DNA methylation data and performed episignature analysis on 64 individuals with Dravet syndrome due to pathogenic loss-of-function (LOF) variants in SCN1A and seven individuals with early infantile SCN1A developmental and epileptic encephalopathy due to pathogenic gain-of-function (GOF) variants in SCN1A, relative to a large reference database of controls and rare disease episignature-positive cohorts. We analyzed all samples with LOF variants together and performed separate analyses for missense, nonsense, and GOF variant cohorts. A reproducible blood-derived episignature was not evident in any of the cohorts using current analytical approaches and reference data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.