ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2025
Clinical performance of Abbott ID NOW™ COVID-19 2.0 rapid molecular point-of-care test compared to three real-time RT-PCR assays.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Point-of-Care Testing for Respiratory Infections: A Comprehensive Literature Review (2006-2026).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A rapid and visual dual LAMP-LFD assay for on-site simultaneous detection of influenza A virus (H1N1) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Timely diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 is important for infection control and treatment. Real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT-PCR) tests are the reference standard for diagnosis but often require a centralized laboratory, making them time-intensive and unsuitable for resource-limited settings. The Abbott ID NOW™ COVID-19 2.0 assay is a rapid point-of-care (POC), isothermal molecular test for qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2. We prospectively evaluated its clinical performance against three reference rRT-PCR tests: Hologic Panther Fusion, Roche Cobas, and CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel. Investigators enrolled 3,530 subjects, with 3,146 evaluable. In symptomatic subjects ( IMPORTANCE: The Abbott ID NOW
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.