ArticleCancer research communications2025
Functional Profiling of p53 and RB Cell Cycle Regulatory Proficiency Suggests Mechanism-Driven Molecular Stratification in Endometrial Carcinoma.
Article in Cancer research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endocrine Therapy for Endometrial Carcinoma: Current Evidence, Resistance Mechanisms, and Biomarker-Driven Patient Selection.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Molecular Landscape of TP53/RB1 Co-Altered Tumors Uncovers Emerging Therapeutic Vulnerabilities.Genes, chromosomes & cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractIn the United States, Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the most frequently occurring gynecologic cancer. Many ECs harbor mutations in cell cycle regulatory genes including TP53 and RB1, amongst others. RB and p53 both regulate the G1/S transition while p53 also regulates the G2/M transition and mitotic progression, all of which rely on targetable regulatory kinases. It is likely that many ECs harbor targetable defects in some aspect of cell cycle regulation, but there has been no profiling of p53- or RB- linked cell cycle functional capacity and corresponding therapeutic vulnerabilities in EC cells. Here, we utilize functional and transcriptomic assays on a panel of EC cell lines and patient-derived organoids to characterize the p53 and RB cell cycle regulatory proficiency and linked therapeutic vulnerabilities in EC. We show that TP53 genomic and functional status has poor predictive capacity for EC therapeutic response. Rather, proper RB regulation correlates with response to G1/S targeting CDK4/6 inhibitors, and dysfunction in regulation of mitotic progression correlates with response to Aurora kinase B inhibitors. A subset of TP53 mutant ECs are RB1 wild type, express RB protein, have intact RB regulation, and are sensitive to CDK4/6 inhibitors, suggesting that excluding patients from emerging CDK4/6 inhibitor trials based on aggressive histology or TP53 status should be reconsidered. These findings were validated in vivo in xenograft models. These results can expand current EC molecular stratification to include mechanism-driven subtypes and suggest clinical trials of novel targeted therapies based on biologic understanding for advanced or recurrent EC patients. SIGNIFICANCE: We show novel cell cycle regulatory molecular classifications and therapeutic targets for endometrial carcinoma. Intact RB regulation and mitotic progression regulatory defects correlate with CDK4/6 and Aurora kinase B inhibitor sensitivity respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.