ArticleAnaesthesia2024
Time critical diagnoses and transfers of patients with acute type A aortic dissection in the UK: national audit of current practice.
Article in Anaesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between surgical timing and postoperative outcomes in type A acute aortic dissection.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- The aortic window: a temporal framework for acute type A aortic dissection.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Outcome of Transfer Time Difference From Diagnosis to Operation Room in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Complicated by Malperfusion.Annals of thoracic surgery short reports · 2025Article
- Factors associated with symptom-to-surgery time in patients undergoing surgical repair for acute type A aortic dissection: an exploratory analysis from a prospective cohort study.BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies · 2025Article
- Predictive Value of Normalized Lactate Load for Patients with Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Based on the MIMIC-IV Database.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundType A aortic dissection repair is one of the most common emergency cardiac surgical procedures undertaken in the UK and has a high mortality. Early diagnosis and prompt surgery by an expert cardiac surgical team is crucial. Little is known about the patient's journey from first symptoms until surgery.
methodsThe Association for Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Critical Care undertook a prospective national audit of the management of type A aortic dissection in the UK.
resultsThe details of 334 patients with type A aortic dissection were reported by 28 UK cardiac centres over 12 months. Median (IQR [range]) time from onset of symptoms until arrival in an emergency department was 2.3 (1.4-4.7 [0.1-491.6]) h. Median (IQR [range]) time between arrival in the emergency department and the start of surgery was 9.5 (6.1-18.2 [0.8-363.5]) h. Delays in diagnosis and transfers were reported in 158 (47.3%) patients. Fifty-two patients (15.6%) had an initial misdiagnosis. The condition of 56 patients (16.8%) deteriorated clinically before arrival in the operating theatre. A medical doctor accompanied 50 patients (15.0%) during transfer. Sixty-four patients (19.2%) died in hospital with 41 (12.3%) dying within the first 5 days after surgery.
conclusionsThis audit provides a snapshot of current practice for patients with type A aortic dissection in the UK. Our findings show the acuity, clinical severity and vulnerability of patients with type A aortic dissection, and the deficits in the process of diagnosis and the quality of transfer. This audit demonstrates the need for the implementation of comprehensive, regionally governed, interdisciplinary medical management for every patient with type A aortic dissection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.