ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2025
Using Natural Language Processing Methods to Predict Topics Included in 2019 Ohio Syphilis Disease Intervention Specialist Records.
Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of 2019 Ohio Disease Intervention Specialist Records for Syphilis Cases Using Clustering Algorithms.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFree-text notes in disease intervention specialist (DIS) records may contain relevant information for sexual transmitted infection control. In their current form, the notes are not analyzable without manual reading, which is labor-intensive and prone to error.
methodsWe used natural language processing methods to analyze 2019 Ohio DIS syphilis records with nonmissing notes (n = 1987). We identified 21 topics relevant for transmission and case investigations. We manually coded these records to create "gold standard" labels for each topic (0 = topic not present, 1 = topic present), then trained machine learning models to identify the topics in the text. For models to analyze text data, the text must be converted to numbers. We explored 2 approaches to numerically represent words: (1) term frequency, inverse document frequency, which measures importance of words based on how many times they appear in a record and in the dataset as a whole, and (2) GloVe embeddings, which are numerical vectors that were developed by researchers for each word in the English language to encode its semantic meaning. We explored 3 types of statistical models (naive Bayes, support vector machine, and logistic regression) using term frequency, inverse document frequency, and 1 type of neural network model (long short-term memory [LSTM] model) using GloVe. All models were used for binary prediction (i.e., topic not present, topic present).
resultsFor most topics, the LSTM model performed the best overall in identifying topics, and the support vector machine model performed the best among the statistical models. For example, the LSTM model predicted the topic "substance use" with high accuracy (97%), sensitivity (92%), and specificity (98%). No model performed well for uncommon topics (e.g., "alcohol use" or "delays in care").
conclusionsMachine learning models performed well in identifying some topics in 2019 Ohio syphilis records. This analysis is a first step in applying natural language processing methods to making DIS notes more accessible for analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.