ArticleACS chemical biology2025
Workflow for E3 Ligase Ligand Validation for PROTAC Development.
Article in ACS chemical biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeted degradation of protein in hematologic malignancies: mechanisms, therapeutic strategies, and clinical prospects.Cancer gene therapy · 2026Review
- Delivering Degradation: Nanomedicine and Programmable Proximity Platforms for Targeted Protein Degradation.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- On the Scope of DCAF1-Recruiting PROTACs Degrading Protein Kinases.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Assays for Measuring the Cell Permeability of Proteolysis-Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs): Performance, Correlations, Applicability and Recommendations.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Atomic degradation: chemical design strategies and immunotherapeutic mechanisms of radio-PROTACs.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Review
- Proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) in cancer: design principles and applications on "undruggable" targets.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Discovery and Development of a Potent LIMK2 Isoform-Specific Degrader.ACS chemical biology · 2026Article
- A Gold-PROTAC Degrades the Oncogenic Tyrosine Kinase MERTK: Insights into the Degradome from a Steady-State System.ACS chemical biology · 2026Article
- Utilization of Functional Degradation Pathways for the Characterization of Ubiquitin-Proteasome System Tool Compounds.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Cysteine-reactive covalent chloro-N-acetamide ligands induce ferroptosis mediated cell death.EMBO reports · 2025Article
- Cellular parameters shaping pathways of targeted protein degradation.Communications biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) have gained considerable attention as a new modality in drug discovery. The development of PROTACs has been mainly focused on using CRBN (Cereblon) and VHL (Von Hippel-Lindau ligase) E3 ligase ligands. However, the considerable size of the human E3 ligase family, newly developed E3 ligase ligands, and the favorable druggability of some E3 ligase families hold the promise that novel degraders with unique pharmacological properties will be designed in the future using this large E3 ligase space. Here, we developed a workflow aiming to improve and streamline the evaluation of E3 ligase ligand efficiency for PROTAC development and the assessment of the corresponding "degradable" target space using broad-spectrum kinase inhibitors and the well-established VHL ligand VH032 as a validation system. Our study revealed VH032 linker attachment points that are highly efficient for kinase degradation as well as some of the pitfalls when using protein degradation as a readout. For instance, cytotoxicity was identified as a major mechanism leading to PROTAC- and VHL-independent kinase degradation. The combination of E3 ligase ligand negative controls, competition by kinase parent compounds, and neddylation and proteasome inhibitors was essential to distinguish between VHL-dependent and -independent kinase degradation events. We share here the findings and limitations of our study and hope that this study will provide guidance for future evaluations of new E3 ligase ligand systems for degrader development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.