Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39932098›Full record

ArticleACS chemical biology2025

Workflow for E3 Ligase Ligand Validation for PROTAC Development.

Nebojša Miletić, Janik Weckesser, Thorsten Mosler, Rajeshwari Rathore, Marina E Hoffmann, Paul Gehrtz, Sarah Schlesiger, Ingo V Hartung, Nicola Berner, Stephanie Wilhelm and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS chemical biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Nebojša MiletićInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-3157-5937
Janik WeckesserInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5100-2776
Thorsten MoslerInstitute of Biochemistry II, School of Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main 60590, Germany.
Rajeshwari RathoreInstitute of Biochemistry II, School of Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main 60590, Germany.
Marina E HoffmannInstitute of Biochemistry II, School of Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main 60590, Germany.
Paul GehrtzMedicinal Chemistry, Global Research & Development, Merck Healthcare KGaA, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany.
Sarah SchlesigerMedicinal Chemistry, Global Research & Development, Merck Healthcare KGaA, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7880-3936
Ingo V HartungMedicinal Chemistry, Global Research & Development, Merck Healthcare KGaA, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8750-679X
Nicola BernerChair of Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Technical University of Munich, Emil-Erlenmeyer-Forum 5, 85354 Freising, Germany.
Stephanie WilhelmChair of Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Technical University of Munich, Emil-Erlenmeyer-Forum 5, 85354 Freising, Germany.
Juliane MüllerInstitute of Biochemistry, University of Kiel, Rudolf-Höber-Str. 1, 24118 Kiel, Germany.
Bikash AdhikariInstitute of Biochemistry, University of Kiel, Rudolf-Höber-Str. 1, 24118 Kiel, Germany.
Václav NěmecInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6900-1368
Saran Aswathaman SivashanmugamInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Lewis ElsonInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Hanna HolzmannInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Martin P SchwalmInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1252-1829
Lasse HoffmannInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Kamal Rayees Abdul AzeezInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Susanne MüllerInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2402-4157
Bernhard KusterChair of Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Technical University of Munich, Emil-Erlenmeyer-Forum 5, 85354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9094-1677
Elmar WolfInstitute of Biochemistry, University of Kiel, Rudolf-Höber-Str. 1, 24118 Kiel, Germany.
Ivan ĐikićInstitute of Biochemistry II, School of Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main 60590, Germany.
Stefan KnappInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5995-6494

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) have gained considerable attention as a new modality in drug discovery. The development of PROTACs has been mainly focused on using CRBN (Cereblon) and VHL (Von Hippel-Lindau ligase) E3 ligase ligands. However, the considerable size of the human E3 ligase family, newly developed E3 ligase ligands, and the favorable druggability of some E3 ligase families hold the promise that novel degraders with unique pharmacological properties will be designed in the future using this large E3 ligase space. Here, we developed a workflow aiming to improve and streamline the evaluation of E3 ligase ligand efficiency for PROTAC development and the assessment of the corresponding "degradable" target space using broad-spectrum kinase inhibitors and the well-established VHL ligand VH032 as a validation system. Our study revealed VH032 linker attachment points that are highly efficient for kinase degradation as well as some of the pitfalls when using protein degradation as a readout. For instance, cytotoxicity was identified as a major mechanism leading to PROTAC- and VHL-independent kinase degradation. The combination of E3 ligase ligand negative controls, competition by kinase parent compounds, and neddylation and proteasome inhibitors was essential to distinguish between VHL-dependent and -independent kinase degradation events. We share here the findings and limitations of our study and hope that this study will provide guidance for future evaluations of new E3 ligase ligand systems for degrader development.

Indexed as

ProteolysisUbiquitin-Protein LigasesVon Hippel-Lindau Tumor Suppressor ProteinAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingDrug DiscoveryHumansLigandsProtein Kinase InhibitorsWorkflowAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCRBN protein, humanLigandsProtein Kinase InhibitorsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesVHL protein, humanVon Hippel-Lindau Tumor Suppressor Protein

Identifiers

PMID39932098
PMCPMC11851430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.