Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39932041›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2025

The Erector Spinae Plane Block with 20 or 30 mL of 0.25% Bupivicaine Provides Equivalent Postoperative Analgesia after Mastectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

Merve Bıdak, Bahadır Çiftçi, Pelin Basım, Birzat Emre Gölboyu, Yunus Oktay Atalay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Merve Bıdakİstanbul Medipol University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0003-1625-657X
Bahadır Çiftçiİstanbul Medipol University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-3245-6614
Pelin Basımİstanbul Medipol University Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-9452-9276
Birzat Emre Gölboyuİzmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-2011-2574
Yunus Oktay Atalayİstanbul Medipol University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-9928-9956

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Analgesia management following breast surgery is a critical concern. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a regional anaesthesia technique that is frequently used for analgesia after breast surgery. However, there is no consensus on the volume. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare ESPB performed using 20 mL vs. 30 mL. Methods: The study included 43 female patients with American Society of Anesthesiologist class I-II physical status. Participants were randomized into two groups: 20 mL ESPB and 30 mL ESPB. Ibuprofen (400 mg) 3x1 was ordered, and a fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia device was attached intravenously to the participants. If the pain score was ≥4, meperidine (0.5 mg kg Results: Postoperative fentanyl use was similar between the groups. There was no difference in the amount of rescue analgesic use between the groups. The static and dynamic numerical rating scores were similar between the groups. No statistical difference was noted in terms of nausea, vomiting, or itching between the groups. Conclusion: A similar analgesic effect is achieved by performing ESPB using 20 or 30 mL of local anaesthetic at the same concentration.

Indexed as

Breasterector spinae plane blockmastectomypain managementvolume

Identifiers

PMID39932041
PMCPMC11827509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.