ArticleCancer science2025
RETRACTION: Role of the MUC1-C Oncoprotein in the Acquisition of Cisplatin Resistance by Urothelial Carcinoma.
Article in Cancer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
retractionK. Shigeta, M. Hasegawa, E. Kikuchi, Y. Yasumizu, T. Kosaka, R. Mizuno, S. Mikami, A. Miyajima, D. Kufe and M. Oya, "Role of the MUC1-C Oncoprotein in the Acquisition of Cisplatin Resistance by Urothelial Carcinoma," Cancer Science 111, no. 10 (2020): 3639-3652, https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.14574. The above article, published online on 16 July 2020 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Masanori Hatakeyama; the Japanese Cancer Association; and John Wiley & Sons Australia Ltd. The retraction has been agreed upon due to several instances of duplications of western blot bands observed between Figures 2E and 3B; 4A and 4D; S1b and S3a; and within S1d. The authors commented that this was due to inadvertent errors and provided some data including replacement images. However, the data supplied did not meet acceptable standards for raw data and the editors were not satisfied with the explanation provided. Due to the extent of the errors, the editors have lost confidence in the results and conclusions of this study. The authors disagree with the retraction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.