ReviewBioanalysis2025
Singlicate analysis in ADA assays: comparing assay performance in duplicate and singlicate formats.
Review in Bioanalysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunogenicity assessment for vidutolimod: a risk-driven approach for a simplified 1-tiered, singlicate anti-drug antibody testing strategy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Substantial Comparability of Singlicate Versus Duplicate Analysis-A Retrospective Evaluation of Clinical Immunogenicity in a Biosimilar PK Study.The AAPS journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Singlicate anti-drug antibody (ADA) analysis is gaining recognition as a promising approach to optimize immunogenicity assessment. It offers significant benefits in terms of cost-effectiveness and aligns with patient-centric principles. However, its successful implementation requires a thorough understanding of its impacts on assay performance. In this perspective, we review recent case studies comparing singlicate and duplicate formats, focusing on cut point factors and sample result agreement, and seek to discuss how singlicate influences assay cut points and explore considerations for low positive control criteria under singlicate conditions. Furthermore, we propose a strategy for implementing singlicate analysis in both new and existing ADA assays, hoping to contribute to ongoing discussions in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.