ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2025
SCN5A variant type-dependent risk prediction in Brugada syndrome.
Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effect of Ketamine, Xylazine, and Ketamine/Xylazine Administration on SCN5A (Nav1.5) Gene Expression in Pigeons.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Article
- Brugada Syndrome: an exemplar for the genomic basis of sudden death.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Review
- Phenotypic Severity ofCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2026Article
- Characterization of the R893C NaFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- What Should a Clinical Cardiologist Know About Cardiogenetics?Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Review
- Current perspectives on risk prediction and genetic basis of Brugada syndrome.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe variant in SCN5A with the loss of function (LOF) effect in the cardiac Na+ channel (Nav1.5) is the definitive cause for Brugada syndrome (BrS), and the functional analysis data revealed that LOF variants are associated with poor prognosis. However, which variant types (e.g. missense or non-missense) affect the prognoses of those variant carriers remain unelucidated. METHODS AND
resultsWe defined SCN5A LOF variants as all non-missense and missense variants that produce peak INa < 65% of wild-type previously confirmed by patch-clamp studies. The study population consisted of 76 Japanese BrS patients (74% patients were male and the median age [IQR] at diagnosis was 28 [14-45] years) with LOF type of SCN5A variants: 40 with missense and 36 with non-missense variants. Non-missense variant carriers presented significantly more severe cardiac conduction disorder compared to the missense variant carriers. During follow-up periods of 9.0 [5.0-14.0] years, compared to missense variants, non-missense variants were significant risk factors of lifetime lethal arrhythmia events (LAEs) (P = 0.023). When focusing only on the missense variants that produce no peak INa, these missense variant carriers exhibited the same clinical outcomes as those with non-missense (log-rank P = 0.325). After diagnosis, however, both variant types were comparable in risk of LAEs (P = 0.155).
conclusionWe identified, for the first time, that SCN5A non-missense variants were associated with higher probability of LAE than missense variants in BrS patients though it did not change significantly after diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.