ArticleSpine2025
Age-Related Changes and Spinal Sagittal Alignment in Asymptomatic Community Dwelling Adults Over 50.
Article in Spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Longitudinal Changes of Cervical Sagittal Alignment in a Non-surgical Cohort: A 12-Year Longitudinal Study.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Normative Values for Spinopelvic Sagittal Parameters in the Asymptomatic Indian Population.Cureus · 2025Article
- Differences in the aging of the spine according to physical activity levels in older women.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designMonocentric, retrospective, cross-sectional study.
objectiveTo investigate the age-related normative values of sagittal parameters and establish their relationships in asymptomatic community-dwelling adults aged over 50. BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Degenerative changes in the spine with aging alter the sagittal balance, causing spine pathologies. However, there was a lack of comprehensive study on age-related normative values of sagittal alignment and their relationship during degenerative evolution.
methodsAmong a total of 1,370 volunteers, 701 asymptomatic volunteers were recruited. Participants underwent a lateral X-ray, and sagittal parameters were assessed using a customized computer application.
resultsAge showed a stronger correlation with upper arc of thoracic kyphosis (Upper_TK) (r=0.39) compared to sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (r=0.28) and T1_slope (r=0.29). Lumbar lordosis (LL) did not exhibit a significant decrease with age. The geometrical relationship revealed a significant correlation between TK and LL (r=0.52), and LL and pelvic incidence (PI) (r=0.63), as per the equations: TK=Upper_TK+Lower arc of TK (Lower_TK), LL=Upper arc of LL (Upper_arc)+sacral slope (SS), Lower_TK≈Upper_arc, and PI=SS+pelvic tilt (PT). However, after removing intermediate control variables of Lower_TK (Upper_arc) and SS, the correlation between TK, LL, and PI was statistically weak, due to the little to no correlation between Lower_TK (Upper_arc), SS, and PT. Upper_arc (Lower_TK) was a relatively stable parameter with an age-independent value of 15.93±5.61° in elderly adults. For adults aged 60, Upper_TK significantly increased with age, while individuals over 75 exhibited a significant increase in PT and a decrease in SS and LL.
conclusionsOur study provided a normative age-related value of spinal sagittal parameters. To assess the spinal sagittal alignment, it was suggested that LL and TK be divided into two tangential arches based on the location of the lordotic or kyphotic apex. This study offered insights for spine surgeons in preparing for surgical corrections.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.