Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39931757›Full record

ArticleJournal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine2025

Ultrasound Evaluation of the Changes of Ophthalmic Artery Doppler and Optic Nerve Sheath in Pregnant Women With FGR.

Yunqi Chen, Xiaoli Lv, Lijuan Yang, Mingmin Wang, Dan Hu, Min Ren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yunqi ChenUltrasound Department, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoli LvUltrasound Department, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3264-5348
Lijuan YangUltrasound Department, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Mingmin WangUltrasound Department, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Dan HuUltrasound Department, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Min RenUltrasound Department, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9125-2961

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC2704700)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to compare changes in ultrasonic Doppler parameters, particularly the peak ratio (PR) of the ophthalmic artery (OA) and optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction (FGR). Furthermore, it sought to evaluate differences in these parameters across various subgroups and analyze the cut-off value of PR for predicting delivery within 1 week in pregnancies complicated by FGR.

methodsA total of 62 pregnant women in the mid-to-late stages of gestation were enrolled, comprising 31 participants in the FGR group and 31 in the control group. The general conditions, pregnancy outcomes, Doppler parameters of the OA, and ONSD were compared between the two groups. Comparative analysis was performed to investigate differences in OA Doppler parameters and ONSD across FGR subgroups. The predictive value of PR for delivery within 1 week was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

resultsThe PR of the OA was significantly elevated in the FGR group compared to the control group, demonstrating a statistically significant difference. The threshold PR value for predicting delivery within 1 week was 0.565, with a sensitivity of 0.88 and a specificity of 0.58.

conclusionsThe PR value of the OA in pregnant women with FGR is significantly increased and may serve as a reliable predictor for pregnancies complicated by FGR.

Indexed as

Fetal Growth RetardationOphthalmic ArteryOptic NerveUltrasonography, DopplerUltrasonography, PrenatalAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificityfetal growth restrictionophthalmic arteryoptic nerve sheathultrasonic Doppler

Identifiers

PMID39931757
PMCPMC12067155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.