Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39931726›Full record

ArticleMedecine tropicale et sante internationale2024

[Barriers and reluctance to paediatric vaccination (EPI) and vaccination against Covid-19: results of a survey in Niger].

Bernard Seytre, Sanoussi Chaibou, Emmanuel Chabot, Bernard Simon

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Medecine tropicale et sante internationale, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bernard Seytrebnscommunication, 37 rue Gnati, Klikamé, Lomé, Togo.
Sanoussi ChaibouUniversité Laval, Québec, Canada.
Emmanuel ChabotCroix-Rouge française, 98 rue Didot, 75014 Paris, France.
Bernard SimonCroix-Rouge française, 98 rue Didot, 75014 Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vaccination adherence among populations is a complex process involving, on the one hand, the expected benefit of a vaccine, and on the other, the perceived risk. To develop an evidence-based communication strategy aimed at improving vaccination coverage in Niger, we conducted a mixed socio-anthropological study of the perceptions among the population on the benefit and the risk of the childhood (Expanded Program on Immunization, EPI) and the Covid-19 vaccines. While the vaccine coverage for some of the EPI vaccines is above 80%, only 33% of the children are fully vaccinated, according to the national vaccination schedule. The first objective of our study was to understand the perceptions that might explain this drop off.The second objective was to identify the drivers of the low adherence to the Covid-19 vaccination, 22% of the illegible population being vaccinated. Materials and methods: In March 2023, we interviewed 509 people for the quantitative study and 40 people through focus groups and individual interviews for the qualitative one, in Niamey (80% of the interviewees) and two villages. Results: 96.9% of the interviewees think that childhood vaccines are "a good thing," even though 30.6% know that they might have negative side effects. While 87.8% think that it is "easy" or "very easy" to get children vaccinated, 21.4% point out as "annoying" the lack of amiability by the health care workers and 16.9% the waiting time. The qualitative study showed that these two complaints drive some women not to complete the vaccination schedule. We might also hypothesize that, given the perceived lack of amiability, some women don't get enough information on the side effects and their management. Surprisingly, 73.3% of the interviewees think that vaccines against the disease are a good thing, and 83% of those who have heard messages promoting the vaccination approve them. This apparent contradiction with the low vaccine uptake is explained by a very low perception of the Covid-19 risks. More than half of the population surveyed believe that the disease is not present in the country, a very large majority believe that only ill people can transmit the disease, while only 12.8% think they know anybody who has ever been sick with Covid-19. According to our results, the circulating rumors on the vaccines don't play a significant role in the low adherence to Covid-19 uptake, nor in the insufficient completeness of the EPI vaccination schedule. Conclusion: The communication efforts on EPI vaccination should focus on the explanation of the side effects and their management, as well as improving the organization of the vaccination sessions. The communication on Covid-19 vaccination should focus on the reality of the disease in the country and the groups at risk for severe forms.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesPatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccinationVaccination HesitancyAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansImmunization ProgramsMaleMiddle AgedNigerCOVID-19 VaccinesCovid-19EPIGaffatiNiameyNigerPerceptionsSub-Saharan AfricaTirminiVaccinationVaccine refusal

Identifiers

PMID39931726
PMCPMC11809066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.