ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Following intravenous thrombolysis, the outcome of diabetes mellitus associated with acute ischemic stroke was predicted via machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based prediction of post-thrombotic syndrome in unprovoked lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: a two-center study incorporating uric acid and clinical risk factors.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This cohort study aimed to evaluate the prognostic outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and diabetes mellitus following intravenous thrombolysis, utilizing machine learning techniques. The analysis was conducted using data from Shenyang First People's Hospital, involving 3,478 AIS patients with diabetes who received thrombolytic therapy from January 2018 to December 2023, ultimately focusing on 1,314 patients after screening. The primary outcome measured was the 90-day Modified Rankin Scale (MRS). An 80/20 train-test split was implemented for model development and validation, employing various machine learning classifiers, including artificial neural networks (ANN), random forest (RF), XGBoost (XGB), and LASSO regression. Results indicated that the average accuracy of the XGB model was 0.7355 (±0.0307), outperforming the other models. Key predictors for prognosis post-thrombolysis included the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and blood platelet count. The findings underscore the effectiveness of machine learning algorithms, particularly XGB, in predicting functional outcomes in diabetic AIS patients, providing clinicians with a valuable tool for treatment planning and improving patient outcome predictions based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and accuracy assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.