Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39931677›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Human Factors Studies to Assess the Usability of the Faricimab Prefilled Syringe.

Mark R Barakat, Henry M Kwong, Gelson Marcon, Olivia E O'Leary, Liliana P Paris, Petrick Schneider, Yannan Tang, Jordan M Graff

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05569148 (A Phase IIIb, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration or Diabetic Macular Edema to Evaluate the Safety of the 6-mg Faricimab Prefilled Syringe), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05569148 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase IIIb, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration or Diabetic Macular Edema to Evaluate the Safety of the 6-mg Faricimab Prefilled Syringe

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2022 to 2022Enrolled35ConditionsNeovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Macular EdemaArmsFaricimab PFS Configuration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mark R BarakatRetina Macula Institute of Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1328-6314
Henry M KwongDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Gelson MarconF. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Olivia E O'LearyF. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Liliana P ParisGenentech, Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA.
Petrick SchneiderF. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Yannan TangGenentech, Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8464-2817
Jordan M GraffDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Faricimab, the first bispecific antibody designed for intraocular use, is approved for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Here, we report the usability of a novel faricimab 6 mg pre-filled syringe (PFS) configuration that has been designed specifically for intravitreal use. Patients and Methods: A simulated-use human factors validation study enrolling 15 retina specialists and 15 ophthalmic assistants was conducted in a market research facility configured to represent an ophthalmology clinic. Participants' ability to complete tasks related to package handling, dose preparation, and injection of a faricimab 6 mg dose into a polymer eye using the PFS was assessed. In a second Phase 3b, single-arm, actual-use study, the ability of seven retina specialists and six ophthalmic assistants to prepare and administer the PFS in accordance with the instructions for use was assessed. Injections were performed into single eyes of 35 patients with nAMD or DME in three US clinics and patients were followed for 7 days for safety reporting (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05569148). Results: In the simulated-use study, most retina specialists and ophthalmic assistants completed all tasks deemed essential for PFS preparation and administration correctly and without error. Of the 22 tasks, the pass rate was 86.7-100%; 16 tasks had a pass rate of 100%. No use errors were observed during the actual-use study. One patient experienced one mild adverse event of eye irritation that resolved the same day and was deemed unrelated to the study drug. Conclusion: Participants were able to safely and correctly prepare and administer a faricimab 6 mg dose using the PFS in accordance with the instructions for use, under realistic conditions representing the real world. The faricimab 6 mg PFS may therefore offer a more convenient, safe-handling alternative to vial administration.

Indexed as

anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapyhuman factors validation studyintravitreal injectionmedical deviceretina specialist

Identifiers

PMID39931677
PMCPMC11809211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.