ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
Combined Meniscal Saucerization and Repair Versus Subtotal Meniscectomy for Symptomatic Discoid Lateral Meniscal Tears in Children and Adolescents.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Meniscal saucerization combined with repair of a symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) has been expanding. However, the significance of meniscal saucerization with repair involving complex or degenerative tears remains uncertain. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to assess the radiological and clinical outcomes of saucerization with repair performed for symptomatic DLM tears in children and adolescents in comparison with a historical control cohort undergoing subtotal meniscectomy. It was hypothesized that saucerization with repair would lead to superior outcomes compared with subtotal meniscectomy. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study group consisted of 27 knees in 21 patients who underwent saucerization with repair (SR group) between 2011 and 2018, while the historical control group included 22 knees in 20 patients who underwent subtotal meniscectomy (SM group) between 2005 and 2011. Patient age at the time of surgery ranged from 4 to 18 years (mean, 12.1 years). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Lysholm score. The Tapper and Hoover classification based on Rosenberg view radiographs was adopted, and lateral joint space width was measured as a parameter for cartilage/meniscus preservation. Clinical and radiological results were evaluated preoperatively, 2 years postsurgery, and until the final follow-up. Results: The mean follow-up period was 50.6 ± 17.0 months in the SR group and 62.3 ± 41.0 months in the SM group. Lysholm scores significantly improved postoperatively in both groups ( Conclusion: Both groups showed progressive postoperative radiographic degeneration, and clinical outcomes also improved in both groups. Based on the incidence of OCD development, saucerization with repair for complex DLM tears showed advantages over subtotal meniscectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.