ArticleCureus2025
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator for Primary Prevention in Children With Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: A Case Series.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) are at high risk for sudden cardiac death secondary to arrhythmia. However, indications for implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for primary prevention in children with ARVC are unclear. We present three cases of childhood-onset ARVC and discuss the indications of ICD for primary prevention. Case 1 is a 23-year-old woman who was diagnosed with ARVC at the age of 13 years with heart failure. ICD was placed for asymptomatic nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) in recent years. Case 2 is an 18-year-old girl who was diagnosed at the age of 14 years with exertional chest pain and biventricular heart failure, which progressively worsened. She was registered for heart transplantation, and a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator was implanted because of sinus bradycardia. Case 3 is an 18-year-old boy who had bigeminal premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) during a heart disease screening in school at the age of 12 years. Although cardiac function was preserved, he had multifocal PVCs and NSVTs even at rest. Although the PVC and NSVT events did not increase after restricting exercise and β-blocker administration, ventricular fibrillation developed at the age of 15 years. Therefore, the ICD was implanted. Based on these cases, the severity of arrhythmia did not necessarily correspond with the right ventricular function in patients with ARVC. Thus, the risk of fatal arrhythmia should be continuously assessed to determine the appropriate timing of ICD placement for primary prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.