ArticleCureus2025
Challenges in Managing Cephalic Arch Stenosis: A Case of Stent Fracture and Lessons Learned.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cephalic arch stenosis (CAS) is a common cause of vascular access dysfunction in patients undergoing hemodialysis. This report describes a case of recurrent stent fractures and restenosis following endovascular treatment for CAS. A 34-year-old man with diabetic nephropathy and chronic hemodialysis underwent multiple stent placements for CAS. Complications, including stent entanglement during balloon angioplasty and stent fracture due to the cephalic arch's anatomical characteristics, necessitated surgical intervention. This case highlights two critical considerations: the unsuitability of balloon-expandable stents for CAS, as they lack resilience to deformation caused by shoulder movements, and the importance of selecting appropriate balloons to minimize stent damage. The unique anatomical characteristics of the cephalic arch increase the risk of stent bending and fracture, emphasizing the need for careful device selection. This case increases the awareness of stent placement for CAS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.