ArticleCureus2025
Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection in the Management of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Retrospective Assessment.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma therapy in promoting wound healing and shoulder function recovery after shoulder surgery.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in managing lateral epicondylitis (LE), focusing on pain relief, functional improvement, side effects, and patient satisfaction.
methodsA retrospective analysis of 19 patients treated with PRP injections at a tertiary care center was conducted. Data included demographic characteristics, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores, and patient satisfaction. Statistical analyses utilized paired t-tests and one-sample proportion tests. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.
resultsPRP injections significantly reduced VAS pain scores, with 21.05% (4/19) of patients achieving complete pain relief (VAS=0) and 47.37% (9/19) reducing scores to ≤3 (p=0.027). DASH scores improved substantially, with mean scores decreasing from 87.5% (19/19) (95% CI: 82.3-92.7%) pre-treatment to 18.5% (19/19) (95% CI: 12.7-24.3%) post-treatment (p<0.001). Prior corticosteroid use was associated with poorer outcomes (p=0.012). Patient satisfaction was high, with 89.5% (16/19) of patients reporting being "very satisfied" or "satisfied" (p=0.001).
conclusionPRP injections offer significant pain relief and functional improvement for patients with LE. This minimally invasive treatment is particularly valuable for high-demand populations, such as professional athletes, due to faster recovery times and reduced need for surgery. However, high patient satisfaction rates underscore its clinical utility. Prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to further validate these findings and refine PRP protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.