Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39931599›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Giant Cell Arteritis and the Use of Ultrasound in Its Diagnosis.

Hridya Harimohan, Rohini Bilagi, Quynh Huynh

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hridya HarimohanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kern Medical, Bakersfield, USA.
Rohini BilagiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.
Quynh HuynhDepartment of Rheumatology, Kern Medical, Bakersfield, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giant cell arteritis is a form of vasculitis causing inflammation of large and medium-sized arteries, including the aorta and its major branches and the temporal artery. Temporal artery biopsy can confirm the diagnosis and should be performed as soon as possible after referral but should not interfere with the initiation of glucocorticoid therapy. A biopsy is typically performed within one week of starting glucocorticoids. However, false negatives may occur due to the segmental nature of giant cell arteritis, inadequate vessel length, or inadequate interpretation. A 60-year-old male with a past medical history of type II diabetes mellitus presented with a headache for the past three days. He did not report any worsening of vision. Physical examination was significant for prominent bilateral temporal arteries and bilateral shoulder, arm, and hip tenderness. Carotid artery duplex ultrasound showed less than 50% stenoses of the internal carotid arteries bilaterally. The patient reported improvement of symptoms, including headache and shoulder and hip pain following steroids. The patient was also continued on prednisone 20 mg and started on tocilizumab 162 mg once weekly. This case report highlights the significance of a duplex ultrasound of carotid arteries as an effective alternative to temporal artery biopsy. Duplex ultrasound is a more sensitive, non-invasive, and cost-effective test and could be considered as an aid in diagnosis.

Indexed as

colored flow doppler ultrasoundgiant cell arteritis (gca)halolarge vessel vasculitis

Identifiers

PMID39931599
PMCPMC11809672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.