Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39931571›Full record

ArticleOpen research Europe2024

How science and policy came together and made a global impact: The EU common list of COVID-19 antigen tests.

Barbara Raffael, Mauro Petrillo, Gabriele Leoni, Tobias Wiesenthal, Yoline Kuipers, Maddalena Querci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open research Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Barbara RaffaelEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Mauro PetrilloSeidor Italy S.r.l., Milan, 20129, Italy.
Gabriele LeoniEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4899-5284
Tobias WiesenthalEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), Geel, Belgium.
Yoline KuipersEuropean Commission, Directorate-General Health and Food Safety (SANTE), Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Maddalena QuerciEuropean Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Science can play a pivotal role in providing support to public health policy making processes, and to ensure effective and efficient implementation of policies. This work illustrates how science was integrated into policymaking during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, in relation to countries' COVID-19 antigen testing strategies as well as the implementation of Regulation (EU) 2021/953 on the EU Digital COVID Certificate. The lessons learnt during this process as well as the critical steps taken, and concrete recommendations, have been identified and capitalised and turned into a list of science-based advice. The availability of an already established mechanism that can be quickly adapted in case of need, is likely to be highly beneficial in case of a future public health emergency.

Indexed as

COVID-19policy supportscience for policy

Identifiers

PMID39931571
PMCPMC11809469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.