Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39931559›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Efficacy of dietary modifications and mucosal protectors in the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux: a multicenter study.

Matteo Gelardi, Rossana Giancaspro, Christian Fiorentino, Stefano Patruno, Jacopo Marroni, Alessandro D'Avino, Letizia Neri, Michele Cassano, Giampiero Neri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Matteo GelardiUnit of Otolaryngology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Rossana GiancasproUnit of Otolaryngology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Christian FiorentinoUnit of Otolaryngology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Stefano PatrunoUnit of Otolaryngology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Jacopo MarroniNeurosciences Imaging and Clinical Sciences Department, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Alessandro D'AvinoDepartment of Medical Sciences, IDI-IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Letizia NeriDepartment of Otolayngology, University of Insubria, Varese, VA, Italy.
Michele CassanoUnit of Otolaryngology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Giampiero NeriNeurosciences Imaging and Clinical Sciences Department, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is defined as an extraesophageal reflux of gastroduodenal contents to the laryngopharynx, affecting the upper aerodigestive tract. There is currently no standardized treatment protocol for LPR. The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is widely established in common practice and derives from the standard approach of using PPIs to treat patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, as PPIs may not be effective on all types of reflux, the aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of dietary changes and mucosal protectants, alone or in combination, in LPR treatment. Methods: This multicenter randomized controlled trial included 48 patients divided into three groups: dietary modifications only, mucosal protectors only, and a combination of both. The patients' responses were assessed over 1 month using the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Finding Score (RFS), along with measurements of salivary and nasal pepsin concentration and rhinomanometry. Results: Significant improvements were observed in RSI and RFS scores across all groups. The group receiving combined dietary modifications and mucosal protectors showed the most substantial benefits. Additionally, a notable reduction in salivary and nasal pepsin concentrations and nasal resistances was observed, particularly in patients combining dietary modifications and mucosal protectors. Conclusion: The study showed that combined dietary modifications and mucosal protects strategies effectively manage LPR symptoms, offering a potential therapeutic approach.

Indexed as

dietary modificationslaryngopharyngeal refluxmucosal protectorspepsinpep test

Identifiers

PMID39931559
PMCPMC11808125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.