ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2025
Clinical Burden and Healthcare Resource Use of Asthma in Children in the UK.
Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Clinical and Economic Impact of Biologic Agents in Asthma Management: a Systematic Review.Lung · 2026Pooled it
- Parental autoimmune diseases and offspring's allergic disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: UK pediatric asthma prevalence is among the highest in Europe, and although the clinical and economic burden of asthma in UK adults is well described, childhood asthma data is lacking. We assessed the clinical and economic burden of asthma in children in the UK to better understand the impact of pediatric asthma. Methods: This was a retrospective, case-matched, longitudinal analysis using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD database and linked patient-level data (Hospital Episode Statistics and Office for National Statistics datasets) of selected patient (aged 6-11 years) records in 2017. Severe exacerbation and re-exacerbation rates per patient-year (PPY), all-cause healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and HCRU-related costs were assessed in asthma patients versus matched non-asthma controls, stratified by severity. Results: Among 5950 patients, severe exacerbation rate was 0.06, 0.17 and 0.31 PPY for mild, moderate, and severe asthma, respectively. Incident rate of severe exacerbations were higher for moderate asthma (incident rate ratios [IRR; 95% CI] 2.87 [2.30-3.56], Conclusion: In children with asthma in the UK, increasing disease severity was associated with increased risk of severe exacerbations, re-exacerbations, and increased HCRU and costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.