ArticleHeliyon2025
PortNet: Achieving lightweight architecture and high accuracy in lung cancer cell classification.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As one of the cancers with the highest incidence and mortality rates worldwide, the timeliness and accuracy of cell type diagnosis in lung cancer are crucial for patients' treatment decisions. This study aims to develop a novel deep learning model to provide efficient, accurate, and cost-effective auxiliary diagnosis for the pathological types of lung cancer cells. Method: This paper introduces a model named PortNet, designed to significantly reduce the model's parameter size and achieve lightweight characteristics without compromising classification accuracy. We incorporated 1 × 1 convolutional blocks into the Depthwise Separable Convolution architecture to further decrease the model's parameter count. Additionally, the integration of the Squeeze-and-Excitation self-attention module enhances feature representation without substantially increasing the number of parameters, thereby maintaining high predictive performance. Result: Our tests demonstrated that PortNet significantly reduces the total parameter count to 2,621,827, which is over a fifth smaller compared to some mainstream CNN models, marking a substantial advancement for deployment in portable devices. We also established widely-used traditional models as benchmarks to illustrate the efficacy of PortNet. In external tests, PortNet achieved an average accuracy (ACC) of 99.89 % and Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 99.27 %. During five-fold cross-validation, PortNet maintained an average ACC of 99.51 % ± 1.50 % and F1 score of 99.50 % ± 1.51 %, showcasing its lightweight capability and exceptionally high accuracy. This presents a promising opportunity for integration into hospital systems to assist physicians in diagnosis. Conclusion: This study significantly reduces the parameter count through an innovative model structure while maintaining high accuracy and stability, demonstrating outstanding performance in lung cancer cell classification tasks. The model holds the potential to become an efficient, accurate, and cost-effective auxiliary diagnostic tool for pathological classification of lung cancer in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.