ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Cost-effectiveness analysis of three surgical approaches for parathyroidectomy in secondary hyperparathyroidism patients.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There are three main surgical treatment options for secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT): subtotal parathyroidectomy (sPTX), total parathyroidectomy with auto-transplantation (tPTX+AT), and total parathyroidectomy (tPTX). However, a debate regarding which of these surgical methods is optimal has been ongoing. Aim of this study is to compare medical costs and final outcomes associated with the three surgical approaches for the entire treatment duration, aiming to identify the most cost-effective surgical method. Methods: Based on previous research data from domestic and international studies, as well as data from on-site surveys, TreeAge Pro 2022 software was used to construct a Markov model for the surgical treatment of SHPT patients. The model was run using data from the 2022 registered population of end-stage renal disease dialysis patients in China (1 million) as baseline cohort. Main indicators for this analysis are total cost, quality-adjusted life years, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The study period is 10 years post-surgery, with a discount rate of 5% per year. Uncertainty in the model was assessed using one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA). Results: The costs incurred by SHPT patients undergoing sPTX, tPTX, and tPTX+AT within 10 years post-surgery are $7042.54, $9983.00, and $11435.60, respectively, with total utilities generated being 13.23 QALYs, 18.76 QALYs, and 18.69 QALYs. Compared to sPTX, the incremental costs and incremental effects of tPTX and tPTX+AT are $2,924.71 and $4,456.66, with 5.53 QALYs and 5.46 QALYs, respectively. The ICER for tPTX and tPTX+AT groups are $532.13/QALY and $805.10/QALY, respectively, which are well below our set willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. Sensitivity analysis results indicate that varying any parameter within a certain range over the given time interval will not cause the ICER to exceed the WTP threshold and will not reverse the primary analysis results. Conclusion: In the Chinese healthcare system, tPTX is considered the most cost-effective treatment for refractory hyperparathyroidism, when compared to tPTX+AT and sPTX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.