SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2024
Shining light on knee osteoarthritis: an overview of vitamin D supplementation studies.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The efficacy of acupuncture for post-stroke dysphagia: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The impact of knee osteoarthritis on individuals' daily functioning is significant. In recent years, Vitamin D supplements cure osteoarthritis has garnered attention from medical professionals and patients due to its simplicity and portability. Several systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) have examined the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation for knee osteoarthritis, yet there is variability in their methodology and quality. Objective: To search, gather, and analyze data on the characteristics and quantitative results of SR/MA in patients with KOA treated with Vitamin D supplementation, and objectively evaluate the efficacy of supplements. Then, provides clinical evidence and recommendations the clinical use of vitamin D supplementation. Methods: Two individuals reviewed and collected data from four databases until October 2023. AMSTAR-2, ROBIS, PRISMA 2020, and GRADE tools were used to evaluate the methodological quality, bias risk, reporting quality, and evidence strength of all SR/MA. Additionally, we applied the corrected covered area (CCA) method to measure overlap in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) cited among the SR/MA. Results: 3 SRs and 6 MAs were included in the analysis: 3 studies were low quality by AMSTAR-2, and 6 studies were very low quality. According to ROBIS, 6 studies were high-risk and 3 were low-risk. In PRISMA 2020 reporting quality, most studies showed deficiencies in comprehensive literature search strategy, reasons for literature exclusion, data preprocessing for meta-analysis, exploration of reasons for heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis, publication bias, and disclosure of funding and conflicts of interest. Grading the quality of evidence in GRADE consisted of 5 items of moderate quality, 14 items of low quality, and 10 items of very low quality. Bias risk and imprecision were the main factors for downgrading. The calculation of RCT overlap between SR/MA using CCA showed a high degree of overlap. Conclusion: Vitamin D supplementation may show potential efficacy in ameliorating symptoms of KOA. The evidence indicates that Vitamin D supplements for knee osteoarthritis can improve patients' Total WOMAC scores and synovial fluid volume in the joints. Nevertheless, due to the generally low quality of current studies, future research should prioritize improving the quality of primary studies to establish the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation for KOA with more robust scientific evidence. Systematic review registration: The protocol of this overview was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/) with the registration number CRD42024535841.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.