Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39931308›Full record

SynthesisMedEdPublish (2016)2024

Looking at Social Interactions in Medical Education with Dual Eye-Tracking Technology: A Scoping Review.

Johannes Lorenz, Juliane Zevano, Nils Otto, Bertrand Schneider, Cihan Papan, Markus Missler, Dogus Darici

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in MedEdPublish (2016), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Johannes LorenzUniversity of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2746-3453
Juliane ZevanoUniversity of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Nils OttoInstitute for Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Bertrand SchneiderHarvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0922-2593
Cihan PapanInsistute for Hygiene and Public Health, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Markus MisslerInstitute for Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Dogus DariciInstitute for Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2375-8792

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Social interactions are fundamental to effective medical practice, yet assessing these complex dynamics in educational settings remains challenging. This review critically examines the emerging use of dual eye-tracking technology as a novel method to quantify, analyze, and enhance social interactions within medical education contexts. Materials and Methods: We performed a scoping review of the literature, focusing on studies that utilized dual eye-tracking within medical education contexts. Our search included multiple databases and journals. We extracted information on technical setups, areas of application, participant characteristics, dual eye-tracking metrics, and main findings. Results: Ten studies published between 2012 and 2021 met the inclusion criteria, with 90% utilizing dual screen-based- and 10% dual mobile eye-tracking. All studies were conducted in the context of surgical training, primarily focusing on laparoscopic surgery. We identified two main applications of dual eye-tracking: (1) as an educational Conclusion: Dual eye-tracking offers a promising technology for enhancing medical education by providing high-resolution, real-time data on social interactions. However, current research is limited by small sample sizes, outdated technology, and a narrow focus on surgical contexts. We discuss the broader implications and potential for medical education research and practice.

Indexed as

Dual Eye-TrackingDual mobile Eye-TrackingEye-TrackingMedical EducationScoping Review

Identifiers

PMID39931308
PMCPMC11809160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.