Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39931231›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2024

A Regression-based Approach to Robust Estimation and Inference for Genetic Covariance.

Jianqiao Wang, Sai Li, Hongzhe Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jianqiao WangDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard University.
Sai LiInstitute of Statistics and Data Science, Renmin University of China.
Hongzhe LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Microbiome and MetagenomicsR01GM123056 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LEE, HONGZHE · 2017 to 2025
$3.7M
Methods for Integrative Genomic Data AnalysisR01GM129781 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Hongzhe Lee · 2018 to 2026
$3.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123056NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM129781
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified thousands of genetic variants associated with complex traits, and some variants are shown to be associated with multiple complex traits. Genetic covariance between two traits is defined as the underlying covariance of genetic effects and can be used to measure the shared genetic architecture. The data used to estimate such a genetic covariance can be from the same group or different groups of individuals, and the traits can be of different types or collected based on different study designs. This paper proposes a unified regression-based approach to robust estimation and inference for genetic covariance of general traits that may be associated with genetic variants nonlinearly. The asymptotic properties of the proposed estimator are provided and are shown to be robust under certain model mis-specification. Our method under linear working models provides a robust inference for the narrow-sense genetic covariance, even when both linear models are mis-specified. Numerical experiments are performed to support the theoretical results. Our method is applied to an outbred mice GWAS data set to study the overlapping genetic effects between the behavioral and physiological phenotypes. The real data results reveal interesting genetic covariance among different mice developmental traits.

Indexed as

bias correctiongenetic relatednessmodel mis-specificationnarrow-sense genetic covarianceregularization

Identifiers

PMID39931231
PMCPMC11810120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.