Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39931214›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Mass resection as a candidate treatment for uterine PEComas of uncertain malignant potential: a case report and literature review.

Haijuan Shi, Yan Yin, Shoujun Liang, Chuanzhong Liu, Yibao Huang, Bingfeng Lu, Liying Zhang

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haijuan ShiDepartment of Gynaecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Yan YinDepartment of Gynaecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Shoujun LiangDepartment of Gynaecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Chuanzhong LiuDepartment of Gynaecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Yibao HuangDepartment of Gynaecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Bingfeng LuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Liying ZhangDepartment of Gynaecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Perivascular epithelioid cell tumours (PEComas) occurring in the uterus are rare, with surgery being the most recommended primary treatment for malignant cases. This study aims to provide clinical guidance on the clinicopathological features and appropriate treatment options for patients with uterine PEComas of uncertain malignant potential. Cases: This case series summarises the clinical courses of 13 patients diagnosed with uterine PEComas of uncertain malignant potential, including clinical and pathological data as well as their outcomes. We identified one case at our hospital, and data for the other 12 cases were extracted from the PubMed database. The 13 patients were aged 9-75 years, with tumour sizes ranging from 1 to 21 cm, and follow-up times ranging from 2 to 71 months. The most common signs and symptoms included abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and abdominal pain. Most of the patients (11/13) were managed surgically without any chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Except for the patients who were lost to follow-up, 11 patients were free of any recurrence or metastasis at their last follow-up. Patients with group A tumours (abundant HMB45 expression) had a longer disease-free survival than those with group B tumours. Conclusions: Surgery alone may be appropriate for uterine PEComas of uncertain malignant potential. Surgical treatment plans should consider the patient's age, fertility requirements, and personal preferences. Mass resection is a viable treatment option for fertility preservation in reproductive-age patients.

Indexed as

case reportfertility preservationperivascular epithelioid celluncertain malignant potentialuterine PEComas

Identifiers

PMID39931214
PMCPMC11807954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.