ReviewMass spectrometry (Tokyo, Japan)2025
Mass Spectrometry as a First-Line Diagnostic Aid for Congenital Disorders of Glycosylation.
Review in Mass spectrometry (Tokyo, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnosis of Congenital Disorders of Glycosylation Type II Subtypes Through Comprehensive N-Glycan Profiling by Mass Spectrometry.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Glycan Sequencing, A Brief Primer.Glycoscience & therapy · 2026Article
- Clinical and Molecular Features of Patients With Congenital Disorders of Glycosylation in Japan.JIMD reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG) constitute a group of rare inherited metabolic disorders resulting from mutations in genes involved in the biosynthesis of glycan chains that are covalently attached to proteins or lipids. To date, nearly 200 genes have been identified as responsible for these disorders, with approximately half implicated in N-glycosylation defects. Diagnosis of CDG is primarily achieved through genetic analysis and the identification of glycan abnormalities, referred to as molecular phenotypes. With the increasing use of whole exome and genome sequencing in the investigation of diseases with unknown etiology, the number of cases suspected of CDG is increasing, highlighting the necessity for glycan analysis. Molecular phenotyping in CDG typically targets glycoproteins, with transferrin and apolipoprotein CIII being key representatives of N- and mucin-type O-glycosylation, respectively. Mass spectrometry (MS) provides rapid analysis and yields moderately detailed information, establishing it as a first-line molecular diagnostic tool that complements genetic analysis. Structural anomalies detected by MS can be classified into distinct patterns, which may indicate specific defects within the glycosylation pathway. In cases of CDG types that lack clear molecular phenotypes, characteristic metabolites can often be identified and quantified by MS, further aiding in the diagnostic process. Molecular diagnosis of CDG using MS can be performed with a standard mass spectrometer and a dried blood spot on filter paper, enabling its application in population-based mass screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.