Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39931154›Full record

ArticleJournal of archaeological method and theory2025

Beyond the Surface: Exploring Ancient Plant Food Processing through Confocal Microscopy and 3D Texture Analysis on Ground Stone Tools.

Andrea Zupancich, Emanuela Cristiani, Melania Di Fazio, Laura Medeghini, Avi Gopher, Juan José Ibáñez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of archaeological method and theory, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea ZupancichDANTE-Diet and Ancient Technology Laboratory, Department of Oral and Maxillo Facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9503-1234
Emanuela CristianiDANTE-Diet and Ancient Technology Laboratory, Department of Oral and Maxillo Facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2748-9171
Melania Di FazioDepartment of Earth Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4472-5631
Laura MedeghiniDepartment of Earth Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8568-8614
Avi GopherSonia and Marco Nadler Institute of Archaeology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-3356-2627
Juan José IbáñezCultural Landscapes, Milá y Fontanals Institution, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2691-077X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ground stone tools are frequently found in archaeological contexts from early to late prehistoric times. These tools are key evidence for reconstructing past societies' lifeways, technology and know-how, given their role in different tasks, including subsistence and craft activities. In recent years, the field of use-wear studies on ground stone tools showed an exponential growth in applying quantitative methods at all scales of observations, from macro to micro. These included using 3D models to measure and identify worked areas, spatial analyses for exploring trace and residue distribution, and confocal profilometers to analyse micro-polish texture. In this paper, we present results stemming from the application of confocal light microscopy and 3D surface texture analysis to identify and distinguish micro-polishes deriving from the processing of plant foods. We tested the potential of this method by analysing micro-polishes on modern limestone replicas used for grinding, pounding and dehusking wild and domestic cereal grains and legumes. Following a multi-level analysis, we demonstrate the efficacy of confocal microscopy and 3D surface texture analysis in correctly discriminating between different micro-polishes. We show how this method, integrated with the qualitative assessment of use-wear, may enhance functional interpretations of ground stone tools; we also discuss the current limits and future perspectives for their systematic application in the study of archaeological assemblages. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10816-025-09697-6.

Indexed as

3D Surface texture analysisConfocal microscopyExperimental archaeologyGSTPlantsUse-wear

Identifiers

PMID39931154
PMCPMC11807085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.