Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39931145›Full record

ArticleNational science review2025

A high-velocity star recently ejected by an intermediate-mass black hole in M15.

Yang Huang, Qingzheng Li, Jifeng Liu, Xiaobo Dong, Huawei Zhang, Youjun Lu, Cuihua Du

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in National science review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yang HuangSchool of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Qingzheng LiYunnan Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650011, China.
Jifeng LiuNational Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
Xiaobo DongYunnan Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650011, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2449-9550
Huawei ZhangDepartment of Astronomy, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Youjun LuSchool of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1310-4664
Cuihua DuSchool of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The existence of intermediate-mass black holes (IMBHs) is crucial for understanding various astrophysical phenomena, yet their existence remains elusive, except for the LIGO-Virgo detection. We report the discovery of a high-velocity star J0731+3717, whose backward trajectory about 21 Myr ago intersected that of globular cluster M15 within the cluster tidal radius. Both its metallicity [Fe/H] and alpha-to-iron abundance ratio [[Formula: see text]/Fe] are consistent with those of M15. Furthermore, its location falls right on the fiducial sequence of cluster M15 on the color-absolute magnitude diagram, suggesting similar ages. These findings support the notion that J0731+3717 was originally associated with M15 at a confidence level of 'seven nines'. We find that such a high-velocity star ([Formula: see text] km s[Formula: see text]) was most likely tidally ejected from as close as one astronomical unit to the center of M15, confirming an IMBH ([Formula: see text] with a credibility of 98%) as the exclusive nature of the central unseen mass proposed previously.

Indexed as

globular clusterHills mechanismhypervelocity starintermediate-mass black holelarge-scale survey

Identifiers

PMID39931145
PMCPMC11809261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.